The State University of New Jersey
RUTGERS |
Fall, 1998
Prof. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi
Ackerson 315
Prof. Peter Gillett
180 University Avenue
Newark, NJ 07102
Tel: (973) 353-5002
Class Hours:
Fridays after the seminar (either Newark or New Brunswick
depending
on the Seminar)
Office Hours:
Before and after class (and by appointment)
Best method of contact: e-mail miklosv@andromeda.rutgers.edu
Course Materials
Journal Articles:
See Reading List
Other References:
AICPA, Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards.
Any good basic Auditing book (e.g. Loebbecke & Arens; Robertson)
Pre-Requisites
Participants in this seminar
are assumed to have had basic accounting (financial and managerial),
auditing and some research methodology. If this is not the case
a special supplementary reading list
will be prepared with the instructor.
Requirements
Classroom participation, paper presentations,
mini-project, and a final exam will serve as the main
medium of instruction in this course. Students are expected to have
read all required assignments and
lead the discussion in the papers they are assigned to during the
semester.
Each research paper will have a "discussant"
assigned who will be responsible for presenting the
paper as if he/she was the author and defend it as well as analyze
it. It is a good idea to prepare a written
critique and pass it along to the other class participants and the
instructor prior or at the beginning of the
class. The discussant should also perform a literature search of
related papers and be able to present it in class.Other class participants
must also read the paper in detail, prepare
a summary, hand it to the instructor.
They may be called to support (or replace) the discussant.
Seminar grade will
be assigned based on the discussions presented, on the participation in
the seminar,
on the mini-project, and on the final exam which will be in the
form and content of a field exam.
All students are
required also to participate in the Accounting Research
Forum being held on Fridays
10:00: 11:30.Students are expected to prepare and ask questions
to the presentor and also hand in these
questions to the instructor.
The mini-project
is of the form of a term-paper and students may choose to replicate an
experiment, examine in the research format a particular audit issue, use
an empirical database or any other relevant project approved
by the instructor. The objective of the mini-project is to
provide the participants with an experience in audit research. The mini-project
is due the last day of classes and projects not received at the beginning
of that class
will be assigned a failing grade.
Course Outline |
Date Topic Reading Assignment.
Sept 04, 1998 Introduction, Exploratory Data Analysis
EDA, Tukey, Addison-Wesley, 1979.
Brown, Gardner & Vasarhelyi, Accounting Research Directory:
the database of accounting literature, Markus Wiener Publishing, Princeton,
NJ, 1994.
Sept 11, 1998 Internal Control
Meservy, Bailey & Johnson, "Internal Control valuation: A Computational Model of the Review Process," Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice, Fall 1986: 44-74.
Ashton, "An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgments,"
Journal of Accounting Research, Spring 1984:
143-157.
Biggs & Mock, ""An Investigation of Auditor Decision Processes
in the Evaluation of Internal Controls and
Audit Scope Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research Spring
1983: 234-255.
*
Emby ,C, Finley,D, Debiasing Framing Effects In Auditors' Internal
Control Judgments And Testing
Decisions, Su, 97, 55, 77,
Car
* Meservy,
Bailey & Johnson, "Internal Control Evaluation: A Computational Model
of the Review Process,"
Auditing: A Journal of Theory
and Practice, Fall 1986: 44-74.
*
Ashton, "An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgments," Journal
of Accounting Research, Spring 1984:
143-157.
LEGEND:
Aud.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory
JAR
Journal of Accounting Research
TAR
The Accounting Review
JofA
Journal of Accountancy
AOS
Accounting, Organization & Society
JAL
Journal of Accounting Literature
JAE
Journal of Accounting and Economics
* Biggs
& Mock, ""An Investigation of Auditor Decision Processes in the Evaluation
of Internal Controls
and Audit Scope Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research Spring
1983: 234-255.
Optional readings:
Trotman, Yetton & Zimmer,
"Individual and Group Judgments of Internal Control Systems," Journal of
Accounting Research, Spring 1983.
Emby ,C, , Framing And Presentation
Mode Effects In Professional Judgment: Auditors' Internal Control
Judgments And Substantive Testing Decisions, Sl, 94, 102, 115, Aud.
* Turner,Jl, ,
The Impact Of Materiality Decisions On Financial Ratios: A Computer Simulation,
Sp, 97,
125, 147, Jaaf.
*
Edwards,W, , "Number Magic, Auditing Acid And Materiality--A Challenge
For Auditing Research", Au,
95, 176, 187,
Aud.
*
Fisher, The Effects of Reporting Auditor Materiality Level Publicly, Privately
or Not at All in an Experimental
Market Setting,"
Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 1990 Supplement: 184-223.
* Whittington
& Margheim, The Effects of Risk, Materiality, and Assertion Subjetivity
on Externa; Auditor Reliance
on Internal
Auditors" Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice, Spring 1993, pp.
50-64..
Optional readings:
Ward,
"An Investigation of the Materiality Construct in Auditing," Journal of
Accounting Research,
Spring 1976: 138-152.
Holstrum & Messier, "A Review and Integration of Empirical Research
on Materiality," Auditing:
A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall 1982: 45-63.
Moriarity & Barron, "Modeling the Materiality Judgments of Audit Partners,"
Journal of Accounting
Research, Autumn 1976: 320-341.
Moriarity & Barron, "Modeling the Materiality Judgments of Audit Partners,"
Journal ofAccounting
Research, Autumn 1976: 320-341.
Loebbecke, Eining & Willingham, "Auditors' Experience with Material
Irregularities: Frequency,
Nature and Detectability, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring
1989, pp. 90-100.
Sept 25, 1998 Audit Risk (Peter Gillett)
(Cushing, et al. 1995)
(American Institute of Certified Public Accountants 1981)
(American Institute of Certified Public Accountants 1983)
(Cushing and Loebbecke 1983)
(Jiambalvo and Waller 1984)
(Kinney 1983)
(Kinney 1989)
(Sennetti 1990)
(Waller 1993)
(Daniel 1988)
(Strawser 1990)
(Strawser 1991)
(Haskins and Dirsmith 1995)
Oct.
02, 1998
Audit Evidence, Audit Risk & Expert
Systems (Peter Gillett)
(Leslie 1984)
(Leslie et al. 1986)
(Boritz and Wensley 1990)
(Gillett 1993)
(Toba 1975)
(Kissinger 1977)
(Stephens 1983)
(Dutta 1991)
Oct 09, 1998 Audit Practice Research
*McDaniel, L S., "The Effects of Time Pressure and Audit Program Structure on Audit Performance, “Journal of Accounting Research," Vol. 28, No. 2 Autumn 1990, pp. 267-285.
*Iyer ,Vm, Iyer ,Gs, Effect Of Big 8 Mergers On Audit Fees: Evidence From The United Kingdom, Fa, 96, 112, 132, Aud.
*Brackney,Ks, Helms ,Gl, A Survey Of Attestation Practices, Fa, 96, 85, 98, Aud.
* Ashton, Willingham & Elliott, "An Empirical Analysis of Audit Delay," Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn 1987: 275-292.
*
Firth
,M The Provision Of Nonaudit Services By Accounting Firms To Their Audit
Clients,
Summer
1997 page 1 Contemporary Accounting Research.
Optional Readings:
Collins,
K. M. & Killough, L. N., "An Empirical Examination of Stress in PublicAccounting,"
Accounting
Organizations
& Society, Vol. 17, Number 6,
August 1992, pp. 535-548.
Loebbecke
& Steinbart, "An Investigation of the Use of Preliminary Review to
Provide Substantive Audit Evidence,"
Auditing:
A Journal of Theory and Practice, Spring 1987: 74-89.
Davis
& Weber, "The Impact of Advanced Computer Systems on Controls and Audit
Procedures, "Auditing:
A
Journal of Theory and Practice, Spring 1986: 35-49.
Chow,
McNamee & Plumlee, "Practitioners' Perceptions of Audit Step Difficulty
and Criticalness:
Implications
for audit Research," Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice, Spring
87: 123-133.
Newton
& Ashton, "The Association Between Audit Technology and Audit Delay,
Auditing: A Journal of
Practice
and Theory, Supplement 1989, pp. 22-27.
Oct. 16 1998 Analytical Review
*
Kinney,
"Attention-Directing Analytical review Using Accounting Ratios: A Case
Study, Auditing:
A Journal of Theory and Practice, Spring 1987, 59.73.
*
Heiman, V. "Auditors' Assessment of Likelihood of Error Explanation in
Analytical
Review," The
Accounting Review," Vol. 65, No. 4, October 1990, pp. 875-890.
*Wilson,Ac,
Weld ,Lg, Regression As An Analytical Procedure: Are Adjustments
For Autocorrelation
Really Necessary?, Wi, 97, 67, 82, Jaaf.
*
Dzeng,
“A Comparison of Aanalytical Procedure Expectation Models Using both
Aggregate
and Disaggregate Data,” Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice,
Fall 1994,
pp. 1-24.
Optional Readings:
Darocca
& Holder, "The Use of Analytical Procedures in Review and Audit Engagements,"
Auditing:
A
Journal of Theory and Practice, Spring 1985: 80-92.
Tabor
& Willis, "Empirical Evidence on the Changing Role of Analytical Review
Procedures," Auditing:
A
Journal of Theory and Practice, Spring 1985: 93-103.
Biggs
& Wild, "A Note on the Practice of Analytical Review, "Auditing: A
Journal of Theory and
Practice,
Spring 1984: 68-79.
Kinney & Felix, "Analytical Review Procedures," Journal of Accountancy, Oct. 1980: 95-105.
Kinney,
"The Predictive Power of Limited Information in Preliminary Analytical
Review: An Empirical
Study,"
Journal of Accounting Research, Supl. 1979: 148-165.
Heintz
& White, "Auditor Judgment in Analytical Review," Auditing: A Journal
of Practice and Theory,
Spring
1989, pp. 22-39.
Oct. 23, 1998 Auditing Markets
*
Iyer ,Vm, Iyer ,Gs, Effect
Of Big 8 Mergers On Audit Fees: Evidence From The
United
Kingdom, Fa, 96, 112, 132, Aud
*
Hackenbrack,Ke, Knechel,Wr, Resource Allocation Decisions In Audit
Engagements,
Fa, 97, 481, 499, Car
* Roberts,
Glezen & Jones, "Determinants of Auditor Change In the Public sector,"
Journal of
Accounting Research, Spring 1990, 220-228.
* Ettredge
& Greenberg, "Determinants of Fee Cutting on Initial Audit Engagements,"
Journal of
Accounting Research, Spring 1990, pp. 198-210.
Optional Readings:
Schatzberg, "A Laboratory Market Investigation of Low Balling in Audit
Pricing,"
The
Accounting Review, April 1990, 337-362.
Turpen, "Differential Pricing on Auditors' Initial Engagements:; Further
Evidence,"
Auditing:
A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring 1990, pp. 60-76.
Magee & Tseng, "Audit Pricing and Independence," The Accounting Review,
April 1990,
315-336.
De Angelo, "Auditor Size and Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting and
Economics,
Dec.
1981: 183-200.
Audit Judgment Joyce & Biddle, "Anchoring and Adjustment In Probabilistic
Inference
in Auditing," Journal of Accounting Research, Spring 1981: 120-144.
Srinidhi & Vasarhelyi, "Auditor Judgment Concerning Establishment of
Substantive
Tests
Based on Internal Control Reliability," Auditing: A Journal of Theory and
Practice, Spring 1986: 64-76.
Chow, "The Demand for External Auditing: Size, Debt and Ownership Influences,"
The Accounting Review,
Apr.
1982: 272-291.
Oct.
30, 1998
Probabilistic (and Quasi-Probabilistic)
Expert Systems(Peter Gillett
(Lauritzen
and Spiegelhalter 1988)
(Shenoy and
Shafer 1990)
(Jensen et
al. 1988)
(Jensen et
al. 1990)
(Shafer 1996)
(Shafer and
Srivastava 1990)
(Srivastava
and Shafer 1992)
(